The strategy founder Michael Sayler has created a controversy with his amazing comments on the ‘proof-off-revolution’. A viral video shows the Saylor calling exchanges and companies on———-three to publish a ‘bad idea’ companies, which ignite a warm debate on the X platform.
Saylor thinks that proof of publication is not good
Earlier today, bitcoin proposer and analyst Michel shared a thread On his official X page, Michael Sayler reveal the proof-off-revolution view. During the 26 May incident related to the Bitcoin 2025 conference in Las Vegas, Michael Sayler said, “This is a bad idea, referring to the proof-of-revolutions.”
Significantly, the suspicion of Michael Sayler on the idea is primarily inspired by its potential boundaries and risks. According to the founder of the Microstrategy, by publishing evidence-reservoirs, companies are exposing themselves to safety threats and other weaknesses. They said,
The current, traditional method of publishing the evidence of the store is an unsafe proof of the store. This actually dilutes the safety of the issuer, mentor, exchanges and investors. This is not a good idea, this is a bad idea. ,
While reflecting the mass debate of FTX and Mount.Gox, Sailor stated that the Crypto industry could draw valuable lessons from these collapse. However, he believes that publishing por is not an ideal way. He argues that publishing the butche’s address will make it easier to track the transaction back and forth, increasing the weaknesses for the issuer, mentor, exchange and investors.
To advance your points, the Microstrategy founder suggests using AI to analyze the safety problems of the publication wallet address. He claims that the AI will generate about 50 pages of concerns, highlighting the potential long -term risks to the company’s safety. He said, “Go to AI, keep it in deep think mode and then ask ‘What are the security problems of publishing your wallet addresses?” And ‘how can it reduce your company’s safety over time. ,
This development comes the following 4,020 Bitcoin’s latest addition of microstratiTo bring its total holdings to 580,250 BTC.
Community Saylor’s comments find a red flag
In particular, significant comments on Michael Sirer’s proof-off-revolution have attracted extensive attention, some have raised concerns about their thoughts and possible results to the responsible results for industry accountability standards. Despite the growing evidence between crypto exchanges after FTX collapse, cryptocurrency-related crimes are increasing. recently, Hong Kong police torn The $ 15 million Cryptocurrency laundering ring arrests 12 individuals involved in the operation.
In response to Michael Siler’s comments, the Crypto community shared its views. For example, many people questioned the Celller’s approach to transparency in Crypto Space. While many support Sayler for their bitcoin investment, their comments on evidence-reference have raised eyebrows. Some Twitter users also called it a red flag and
According to Groke, POR shows property, it is not responsible for liabilities, increases concerns about solvency. Security risks are valid, but modern por methods, such as merclay trees and audit, reduce exposure. Despite concerns, there is no evidence connecting POR to violations. The transparency manufactures trusts, in which the exchange such as crackons adopts the knot. The industry seems to bend towards the knuckle, but security versus openness keeps the business-closed debate alive.
Ninu V Jamal
Ninu V Jamal is an emotional crypto journalist with a three -year experience in Blockchain, Web 3 and Fintech regions. He has established himself as a knowledgeable and attractive voice in cryptocurrency and blockchain space. His experience as an assistant professor in English language and literature has added more in search of informative, well research and accessible material.
Disclaimer: The material presented may include the author’s personal opinion and is subject to the market status. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrency. The author or publication does not have any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
share: