Elon Musk says that her Artificial Intelligence Company XAI will withdraw its AI model, Groke on a new knowledge free from “garbage” and “uncontrolled data” – first to re -write history using it using it.
In an X post on Saturday, Musk said that the upcoming Groke 3.5 model would “advance logic” and wanted it to be used “to re -write the entire corpus of human knowledge, to remove the missing information and errors.”
He said that the model will be then Re -teach On the new knowledge set, claiming that “any foundation model had too much garbage, which was trained on any data.”
Musk’s latest battle against “Vok”
Musk has long claimed that rival AI model, such as Openaii, A Firm he co-establishedAre biased and leave the information which is not politically correct.
Over the years, Musk has seen to shape the products, which he considers to harm political purity and aims to make it a grooc that he calls “anti-voke”.
He also rested Twitter’s content and misinformation moderation when he took over in 2022, which saw the stage flooded with the principles of uncontrolled conspiracy, Extremist material And fake news, some of which were spread by musk itself.
Musk aims to fight the tide of misinformation by implementing a “community note” facility, allowing X users to debank or add those posts that show prominently under objectionable positions.
Groke’s retrening was criticized
Musk’s post attracted condemnation from its critics, including Gary Marcus, Founder of AI Startup and Professor Emeritus of New York University, who compared the bills of billionaires to a dystopia.
“Straight out of 1984,” Marcus wrote On X. “You could not grocke to align with your own personal beliefs, so you are going to write history again to make it suit your thoughts.”
Bernardino Sasoli de ‘Bianchi, Professor of a university at Milan and Professor of Science Darshan, wrote On LinkedIn on the loss of words to comment on LinkedIn on how dangerous Kasturi’s plan is.
Connected: Need the help of chat? It can make you dumb
He said, “When powerful billionaires consider history to be condemnable, as the results are not aligned with their beliefs, we are no longer working with innovation – we are facing story control,” he said. “Writing training data to match the ideology is wrong at every comprehensible level.”
Musk’s call for “facts” brings the principle of conspiracy, lies
As part of his effort to overhall the grouke, Musk called X users to share “divisive facts” to train the bot, specifying that they should be “politically wrong, but really true.”
The answers included the principles of various types of conspiracies and extremist claims of debate, including holocaust deformation, dibank vaccine misinformation, racist pseudo -scientific claims, which are about intelligence and climate change refusal.
Aye eye: AI is good for employment PWC says – ignore AI Doomers
