Economist and author of Bitcoin Standard, Saifedian Ammus, has weighed the debate on spam inscriptions on bitcoin network, suggesting that he would “throw something in the set” will focus on making bitcoin spaming more difficult and expensive to fund a full -time developer.
Ammus commented in response to a thread launched by the pseudonym name developer Grassfedbitcoin, who called the bitcoin core to merge the bridge request #28408, which would enable node operators to filter the inscriptions more easily.
According to Grassfedbitcoin, the lack of inscription filtering equipment contributes to reducing unnecessary blockchain bloat and bitcoin (BTC) Role as a monetary protocol.
“Any nod wants to relay the inscriptions,” he wroteArguing that the increase in OP_RETURN range was appropriate under false beliefs in the past. He pushed to a configable, default policy, which discourages the use of bitcoin to store JPEGS rather than monetary data.
Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream challenged the proposal, described the inscription filtering as a “weapon race”. He said that embedded spam data in bitcoin transactions can be revised endlessly using code structures, requiring a continuous update to filter the tool.
Connected: Bitcoin Ordinals vs. Etharium NFTS: A comparative observation
Ammous has compared bitcoin spam to email
Ammus compared the bitcoin spam issue to email spam – another weapon continues to fight without leaving the race society system.
“It’s not easy, but it is trying to help the spammers insolve rapidly,” said Ammus. He argued that fighting spam is not a censorship, given that node operators already reject invalid transactions.
He said, “So a node runner is looking to remove Retards Spam, no less valid than Retards Spam,” he said.
The debate commented from other users. A participant suggested that the core developers treated spam-coding staff in some startups as “reluctant QA engineers” and simply uncontrolled every trick deployed by them.
Ammus took it forward, proposed to “designate” developers’ work and even hired outside Kodar to overwhelm his system.
The interaction reflects the ongoing tension in the Bitcoin community on the desired use of the network. Along with continuing inscriptions to the network, calls for technical counterichers – and those who protect spas indicated – are increasing loudly.
In 4 February report, Mempool Research said Adopt inscriptions Bitcoin can drive a network Average block size 4 megabytes (MB) high Per blocks, more than the current average.
Average block size of bitcoin – The amount of data in each block posted on the public laser of the network – currently around 1.5 MB.
magazine: Arthur Hayes $ 1m
