A collective statement by 31 bitcoin core developers has provoked a global debate among bitcoiners, which after suggesting a hand-closed approach to use bitcoin networks amidst ongoing disputes on non-modal use cases.
The 6 June statement published on the bitcoin core website said, “It is not supporting or supporting non-financial data usage, but accepting that as a censorship-resistant system, bitcoin can be used and used for cases of use, not everyone agree on it.” Said,
Bitcoiners are “not in a position” to keep the mandate
The letter argues that the bitcoin is a network “defined by its users” and that its main contributors “are not in a position” that they give mandate to what software or policies they mandate. It comes amidst the ongoing debate on spam inscriptions on bitcoin networks.
“Being free to run any software is the primary security of the network, which is against force,” it said.
While many bitcoins supported the update with “ACK” comments, others objected.
JAN3 CEO Samson Mow criticized the voice of the letter on the same day. He Said“It is just derogatory to say” this is what is now, very bad. ,
“Bitcoin core gods have gradually replaced the network to enable spam and now also focused on removing obstacles for spammers,” Mav said. “This statement is also unfair,” he said.
On 8 May, bitcoin core developers decided to remove the long-standing range on transactions in the network upgrade to allow for large data segments, which some bitcoinar saw as opening the door for cases of non-financial use.
However, CASA founder Jameson Lop defended the letter. Omit Said“Core Dev is a group that says that we cannot force anyone to run a code that they do not like; here is our thinking on relay policy and network health.”
“When there was no harmonious message, and it was only a group of independent developers who made a personal statement, the bitcoin core was accused of being” poor public relations “,” Lop said: Lop said:
“Now a joint statement has been published, and people find the reason for crying about it.”
The developers argued in the letter that it is better for bitcoin node software that “what will end in the next block is a realistic idea, rather than a technical level to discourage harmless activity at a technical level to try to intervene between transactions and miners.” Added to:
“When we believe that this scene is not conducted universally by all users and developers, it is our honest belief that it is in the best interest of bitcoin and its users, and we hope that our users agree.”
Connected: Is a bitcoin price rally possible by $ 150k till the end of the year?
Bitkinar Carl Horton Said“This is not a little” coin “” bucket “or bit” store “or whatever general purpose data store you have is” Peer to Peer Electronic Cash System. ,
Meanwhile, bitcoin core developer Luke Dashjar criticized the goals of the transaction relay policy mentioned in the statement. “The goals of Len -Deen relay are basically all incorrect,” Dashjar Said,
“To predict whether mining will be done is a centralization goal. It is defeat to expect spam to expect mining. It is harmful to help in spam promoting,” Dashjar said.
The developers said the main goals of the transaction relay are speculating that the bitcoin transactions will be mined, “intensifying block proliferation” for the expected transactions of mining, and helping bitcoin miners to learn about fee-paying transactions.
magazine: $ 79t worth baby boomers are finally getting on board with bitcoin
